Claim for compensation for damage caused by act of administrative misconduct in face of previous Court of Auditors administractive conviction: lack of procedural
Keywords:
Consitutional Law, Civil procedure law, Public Treasury compensation Court of Auditors, Lack of procedural interest Judicial convictionAbstract
The present work investigates the possibility of the Public Prosecutor or other legitimate person filing a Public Civil Action against an act of administrative misconduct, claiming for compensation of values in favour of public Treasury considering the previous conviction of the given public administrator, due to the same acts, by the Court of Auditors. The study of jurisprudence and traditional doctrine took a different view, once it is considered that this duplicity violate constitutional provisions and principles, given that despite the exoress guidance in art. 785 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not lead to the conclusion that procedural interest in a judicial conviction remains in cases where an existing extrajudicial executory instrument produced by the Court of Auditors.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1ª Região
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ao submeterem artigos à Revista do Tribubnal Regional Federal da 1ª Região, os autores declaram ser titulares dos direitos autorais, respondendo exclusivamente por quaisquer reclamações relacionadas a tais direitos, bem como autorizam a revista, sem ônus, a publicar os referidos textos em qualquer meio, sem limitações quanto ao prazo, ao território, ou qualquer outra. A revista fica também autorizada a adequar os textos a seus formatos de publicação e a modificá-los para garantir o respeito à norma culta da língua portuguesa.
