The The constitutional complaint and control of the application of binding decisions: dysfunctionalities of the judgment of Rcl 36.476 by the Superior Court of Justice
Keywords:
constitutional complaint, repetitive appeal, Superior Court of Justice (STJ), precedentAbstract
This article aims to analyze the hypotheses of applicability and the role of constitucional complaint in controlling
application of binding decisions, in light of the normative conformation contained in the Code of Civil Procedure of 2015.
It seeks to undertake critical reflection regarding the judgement of Rcl nº 36.476 by the Superior Court of Justice, which
understood that constitutional complaint was not appropriate for the purpose of guaranteeing compliance with the
decision rendered in judgement of repetitive special appeals (art. 988, § 5, II, of CPC). In this way, the text investigates the
accuracy of the grounds adopted by the STJ, the impacts of this decision on Brazilian system of precedents and resulting
dysfunctions, especially in view of the current jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court, whose understanding of this
subject is divergent.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1ª Região
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ao submeterem artigos à Revista do Tribubnal Regional Federal da 1ª Região, os autores declaram ser titulares dos direitos autorais, respondendo exclusivamente por quaisquer reclamações relacionadas a tais direitos, bem como autorizam a revista, sem ônus, a publicar os referidos textos em qualquer meio, sem limitações quanto ao prazo, ao território, ou qualquer outra. A revista fica também autorizada a adequar os textos a seus formatos de publicação e a modificá-los para garantir o respeito à norma culta da língua portuguesa.
