Constitutional principles and notary activities (Provision 77/2018 of the National Council of Justice – CNJ)
Keywords:
Registry office, constitutional aspects, Principle of morality, NepotismAbstract
This text focuses on a delicate and relevant issue, which currently faces the Corregedorias de Justiça and the National Council of Justice itself: is there specific conditions on the designation of interim agents for notary and registry services? Or yet: the Provision 77/2018, of the CNJ, suffers from a legal defect? The following article, starting from the thematic of the constitutional principles and the legal nature of the notary and registries services, proclaims the full validity of said Provision 77 and the fullfilment of the principles of morality and the prohibition of nepotism in the interim designations presently in question. It also betake the jurisprudence of the Federal Supreme Court to support this thesis.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista do Tribunal Regional Federal da 1ª Região
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Ao submeterem artigos à Revista do Tribubnal Regional Federal da 1ª Região, os autores declaram ser titulares dos direitos autorais, respondendo exclusivamente por quaisquer reclamações relacionadas a tais direitos, bem como autorizam a revista, sem ônus, a publicar os referidos textos em qualquer meio, sem limitações quanto ao prazo, ao território, ou qualquer outra. A revista fica também autorizada a adequar os textos a seus formatos de publicação e a modificá-los para garantir o respeito à norma culta da língua portuguesa.